Sabtu, 04 Januari 2014

Indonesian Migrant Workers: Economic Development, Mobile Phone Technology and Distance Education

This is my final paper in ADTED 470 - PennState World Campus (2011)


Indonesian Migrant Workers: Economic Development, Mobile Phone Technology and Distance Education
(Antonius Tanan)

UCEC (University of Ciputra Entrepreneurship Center) for the last 2 years has been providing entrepreneurship trainings for Indonesian Women Migrant Workers (IWMWs) in Singapore and Hongkong. More than 1.500 IWMWs has attended the trainings and they all work as domestic helpers and live inside the house of the employers. As a trainer for this program I found out the enthusiasm of IWMWs in learning and changing their future even when they only can have one-day off in a week. They can only attend the trainings on Saturdays (Hongkong) or Sundays (Hongkong and Singapore). Acquiring new skill and knowledge is an important strategy of economic development,  however, as full time domestic helpers they have to live in the employer house and practically work more than 40 hours a week.  It is almost impossible for them to enroll into a conventional bricks and mortals educational institutions.  The progess of communication technology and the availability of Distance Education for them will certainly open a new door of opportunity for the IWMWs to achieve a new level of economic development.

The Trend of Women Migrant Workers
According to WIEGO or Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing[1], for over the past three decades, the number of of women among international migrants has increased dramatically.  Approximately half of the estimated 200 million migrants worldwide are women and mostly work as domestic helpers and Asia is a large source of international migrants working as domestics both within Asia and beyond. In the mid-2000s, about 6.3 million Asian migrants were legally working and residing out of their mother land. Three countries become the biggest sources, they are Indonesia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka. Women migrants mostly work as a domestic helpers and they make up 60-80 per cent of registered migrants. On top of that number United Nations Population Fund (2006) predicted there were about 1.2 million illegal migrants in the region and many of them working as domestic helpers.

Mr Jumhur Hidayat the Chief of the National Placement and Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers or Badan Nasional Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (BNP2TKI) stated in October 2009, that there were about 6 millions Indonesian Migrant Workers and  in the year 2010 they could send US$ 10 billion to their family in Indonesia.[2] There was a significant increase compared to the year of 2006. In 2006 they sent USD 5,6 billion,  in the year 2007, it was about USD 6,0 billion, then it reached USD 6,6 billion in the year 2008. The number of IWMWs is about 69% of Indonesian Migrant Workers and the money they sent contributed to 22% of Indonesian foreign exchanges[3]. The 6 million of Indonesian Migrant Workers have created an important economic value for the government and their family but the social cost also exists.
They IWMWs usually come from poor families with limited education. The Indonesian monetary crisis in the year 1997 and 1998 had trigerred more people to leave the country and work abroad. At that time the economic chaos had forced many people out of their jobs and at  the same time there was a dramatic increased of USD exchange to Indonesia local currency (IDR).  Before mid 1997 1 USD was about IDR 2,000 but in the mid 1998 it jumped to be above IDR 15,000. Suddenly the income in foreign currency is much more valuable than the local currency. Many women from poor families were forced to work abroad to support the financial needs of the  family and they became the family bread winner by working overseas. The people of Indonesia and the nation admitted the important role of IWMWs, the remittance sent to the family has supported the family education, family health service, housing, and household goods for the family. However, there is a big question of the sustainability of this welfare. There are at least two problems. Firstly, most of the IWMWs,  due to their lack of education on financial literacy,  can not manage their money well. One of my trainees ever shared to me that before the entrepreneurship training the habit of using the money had been: Send (to the Family), Spend (for the necessity goods in the host country) and Self (self enjoyment). There was no Saving for the future.  Secondly, they are really occupied by day to day household chores and they use the day-off just to rest and relax. As a result, most of them do not have a good plan for their own future. They do not know until when they have to work abroad and do the 3Ds Job (Dirty, Difficult, Dangerous).  On top of that, for those who are married, they have to leave the husband and their children in the homeland. As a result, at present millions of children in Indonesia are motherless kids. 
The Handbook on Domestic Worker Rights across Asia (http://www.apwld.org/pdf/Advance%20Domestic%20Workers%20Rights%2065-85.pdf) published by Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD)
wrote some important facts:
  • “Domestic work” in Asia, as with the rest of the world, is an industry dominated by women.
  • In fact, up to 90% of domestic helpers are female and domestic work is now the most common occupation for women in the region: “employment in private households accounts for about one-third of all female employment in Asia.”
  • Domestic work is also one of the largest drivers of female labour migration in the world.
  • Women from Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Sri Lanka, India and Bangladesh are commonly employed in the wealthier Asian countries of Malaysia, Singapore, HongKong, Japan and Taiwan.
  • Recent surveys have revealed that more than 90 percent of the 240,000 domestic workers in Malaysia are Indonesians
  • Between 2000 and 2003, an average of 79 per cent of all migrants leaving Indonesia to work abroad were women

Eni Lestari, one of the writers of the handbook, a Domestic Worker and Domestic Worker Rights Activist, who is also the President of the Association of Indonesian Migrant Workers Association in Hong Kong (ATKIHK) described her past experiences:
“Seven simple words, yet they describe me. I am a domestic worker. Like many of my sisters and brothers, I was forced to leave my country and my family to engage in work that is widely considered as a “3D” job – dirty, dangerous and difficult. I have also been through the harrowing experience of getting victimized by overcharging, underpayment and denial of rest days. I have experienced the vulnerability brought about by being a live-in domestic worker; the insecurity perpetrated by policies that make domestic workers powerless and voiceless; the lack of services of governments to those in distress; and the deficient mechanisms that are supposed to protect the human, labour and gender rights of domestic workers.”

Distance Education as A Solution
Distance Edducation certainly can offer an important solution for IWMWs. According to US Journal Academic (2011), Distance Education features a number of advantages, they are:
  • Accessibility for those living away from the training center
  • No waste of time or other resources in transport, commuting to a central location for each class
  • Flexibility to study in any convenient location with an Internet connection
  • Self-paced learning:
    • Quickly browse materials that have already mastered, and concentrate time and effort in areas containing new information and / or skills
    • Study materials at a personal speed and intensity, without having to wait for slower pace of the average classroom
    • Flexibility to join conversations in the bulletin board discussion areas at any hour, and to review classmates' comments since the previous visit
  • Just-in-time learning; more opportunities to study the most current material available
  • Flexibility for those with irregular work schedules
  • Accessibility for those with restricted mobility (e.g., handicapped, injured, elderly)
  • Accessibility for those with family responsibilities (e.g., parents with young children at home)
Distance Education has its own unique advantages and according to Moore (2005) and also  the report of the Unesco (2002) on OPEN AND DISTANCE EARNING TRENDS, POLICY AND STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS presented that distance education can meet specific needs of learners and in the case of IWMWs it can serve the specific needs of IWMWs:
  • Increase access and flexibility as well as the combination of work and education
  • providing opportunities for updating skills
  • improving the cost effectiveness of educational resources
  • delivering educational campaigns to this specific target audiences
  • providing emergency training for key target groups
  • expanding the capacity for education in new subject areas
  • balancing inequalities of education between different socio economic group.
And for the employers:
  • offers high quality and usually cost effective professional development in the workplace.
  • allows upgrading of skills, increased productivity and development of a new learning culture.
For our government:
  • increase the capacity and cost effectiveness of education and training systems
  • reach target groups with limited access to conventional education and training
  • support and enhance the quality and relevance of existing educational structures
  • ensure the connection of educational institutions and curricula to the emerging networks and information resources
  • promote innovation and opportunities for lifelong learnin

Education for the IWMWs
I found out in my training that most of IWMWs did not have a life plan, most of them just had a very basic education or educated in a small town or even from remote villages and they never got a proper life skill training.   Ideally, every IWMW should define their life plan before they go abroad. For women with the family, especially, they have to put working abroad as a temporary work and use the opportunity living abroad to enhance their skills and knowledge in order to create a new and better future. Living abroad as a domestic helper certainly is not their dream job.  As Djelantik (2011) stated: “Indonesian women migrant workers are mostly uneducated and have no option rather than working as domestic servant or other low income jobs (cleaning service, waiter, or in some cases, prostitutes) under poor working conditions”.  The IWMWs distance learning program can provide three learning objectives to serve the future of the IWMWs, they are Continuing Education, Employability and Entrepreneurship.
Firstly is Continuing Education. This is a formal education route as many of the IWMWs have not finished basic education and some of them want to finish higher education. The Continuing Education services provide a formal national education in a distance. By doing this they can earn a formal degree while working abroad. Secondly is Employability. It is a service to help the IWMWs to improve their skill and knowledge to enable them to do a better job in the future in their homeland or in the host country. It is more a vocational training as it can be closely related to their present daily work or the future work they want to have. For example, they can learn from a distance certificated training on early childhood education, office administration, elderly care, customer service, teacher education, etc.  ILO (2008) broadly defined employability to encompass all of the skills, knowledge and competencies that enhance a worker’s ability to obtain and retain a job, cope with change and enter the labour market more easily at different periods of the life cycle. This shows us that there are many training subjects needed by the market place. It is why ‘Distance Education’ will become increasingly more important in the 21st century because changes occur in a more tremendous speed.
Thirdly is in the area of Entrepreneurship. It is a series of training to prepare them to be able to start their own business in their homeland. It should include the training of opportunity identification, marketing and selling skill, creativity and innovation and simple business plan. Distance Education on this subject will offer a great help for the IWMWs, because they do not have entrepreneur family background.
The ICT and Distance Education for IWMW
The IWMWs have crucial time limitations to continue their education. Firstly they do not have a luxury to be a full time student who can go to school on a daily basis. Secondly, they have a very short period of time to study every day. However, the progress of ICT have opened a new door of learning opportunity. The present smart mobile phone is capable of handling many things. It can send messages, perform video-conferencing, and get connected with people from almost anywhere in the world at anytime.  Mobile users now have easy and trouble-free access to everything which they would like to do in daily life.  The smartphones even  can take over the functions of computers and laptops. An access to learning now is in the hands of the IWMWs.
The following three facts actually offer advantages for the IWMWs compare to those living in their homeland.  Firstly, they work in country more developed than Indonesia and these countries usually have a high Networked Readiness Index (NRI).  NRI is an important metric in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Network Report. It examines how prepared countries are to use ICT effectively on three dimensions: the general business, regulatory and infrastructure environment for ICT.  It measures the readiness of the three key stakeholder groups (society individuals, businesses and governments) to use and benefit from ICT; and the actual usage of the latest information and communication technologies available.  The IWMWs live and work in a country that provide an excellent infrastructure to connect with many learning resources and also provide them a great opportunity to learn in a distance.  The following is the NRI table of 20 developed countries.
Source: http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/yele/Course/IS540/Global-project/2011/Austria/Recommendations.html

The second advantage of being IWMWs is that they live and work in countries that have lowest ICT price.  It is also a good opportunity to get valuable information and to do Distance Education in a more efficient way. The following graph shows that Singapore and Hongkong have a lower rate  of ICT price compare to many other countries.  
 Source: http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/asia-pacific/global-digital-divide-unchanged-since-2002-8260/international-telecommunication-union-itu-united-nations-economies-lowest-ict-prices-2008jpg/

Communication Technology for the IWMWs
Even though most of the IWMWs are from small towns and villages, all of them have mobile phones.  From my experience dealing with them, I found out most of them have facebook accounts and they connect to the internet through mobile phones. Mobile phones have become the “standard device” of IWMWs.  The penetration of the mobiles has reached even people from poor family in less developed countries. The ITU (International Telecommunication Union) had predicted that mobile phone subscriptions could reach 5 billion subscribers by the end of 2010 – it was an increase of 400 million more subscriptions compare to 2009.  In the year 2009, 4.6 billion subscriptions were reported globally and it represented a 67% penetration rate.
Source: http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/02/24/mobile-phone-subscriptions-may-top-5-billion-in-2010/
However, for a more effective learning process, I think mobile phone is not enough for the IWMWs.  They may check the assignment using the internet connection through mobile phone but writing a paper will be more convenient by laptops or at least tablet PCs.  Mobile phone can be an important door for them to experience Distance Education for the first time. By connecting their mobile phone to learning resources, the IWMWs can utilize their time while in the transportation or waiting the children at the school or even while queueing in the supermarket.
Conclusions
I have four conclusions. Firstly, Distance Education certainly will offer a significant change for the future of millions migrant workers all over the world, provided that specific programs and approaches are available.  Secondly, the involvement of the host governments is a must. A national regulation to allow migrant workers to have an day-off for learning and training must be in place. Government of Hongkong is a role model of a host country for the IWMWs.  The government has a regulation that all migrant workers in Hongkong must have one day off in a week. Without this kind of regulation the IWMWs will not have a sufficient time to improve themselves for the improvement of their future. Thirdly, the campaign and promotion of the importance of learning must be done by Indonesian government to all the IWMWs.  Many of them grow up in a family that do not appreciate good education.  Fourthly, the introduction of user friendly hardware and software or subsidized tablet PCs or laptops for those enrolling in the Distance learning must be considered by Indonesian government to encourage them to learn.

References
Djelantik,S.(2011). Demographic Pressure, Poverty, Human Trafficking and Migrant Workers:an Indonesian Case, Paper presented at the Third Global International Studies Conference on “World Crisis: Revolution in the International Community”,  Porto, Portugal, 17-20 Augusts 2011. Retrieved from http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=demographic%20pressure%2C%20poverty%2C%20human%20trafficking%20and%20migrant%20workers%3A%20an%20indonesian%20case&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wiscnetwork.org%2Fporto2011%2Fgetpaper.php%3Fid%3D707&ei=sNPWTpD9BNDjrAej9uGqDg&usg=AFQjCNESszhiAtmoXHX_NIH6KyLIJP44hg&cad=rja
Freedman, D.H.(2008). Improving skills and productivity of disadvantaged youth / Employment Sector working paper, International Labour Office, Skills and Employability Department.  Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/download/wpaper/wp7.pdf

Moore, M.G. and G. Kearsley, (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View. Second Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Co.

UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund. (2006). Domestic Workers, Far From Home. Retrieved From http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2006/moving_young_eng/stories/stories_Noraida.html

UNESCO (2002), Open And Distance Learning Trends, Policy And Strategy Considerations. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001284/128463e.pdf

US Journal Academic (2011). The Advantages of Distance Learning. Retrieved from

http://www.usjournal.com/en/students/help/distancelearning.html

Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO). (2011). Retrieved from http://wiego.org/informal-economy/occupational-groups/domestic-workers




[1] http://wiego.org/informal-economy/occupational-groups/domestic-workers

[2] http://keuangan.kontan.co.id/v2/read/keuangan/24292/2010-Nilai-Remittance-TKI-Bakal-Mencapai-Rp-100-T-
[3]Djelantik, Sukawarsini (2011). Demographic Pressure, Poverty, Human Trafficking and Migrant Workers: an Indonesian Case.


The Annotated Bibliography on The Pedagogy of Entrepreneurship Education

This is my paper in ADTED 460-PennState World Campus (2011)


The Annotated Bibliography on The Pedagogy of Entrepreneurship Education
Antonius Tanan

I have been in the entrepreneurship education for more than 6 years. I have a privilege to be the President of University of Ciputra Entrepreneurship Center and I do my journey in this field I feel that the pedagogy of entrepreneurship education needs more rigorous theories. It is one of the reason I enroll in this Adult Education program of Penn State. I decided to review literature and internet search from the year 1990 up to the 2008, my purpose is to find a consistent concept from one year to another. After I did my research and wrote this Annotated Bibliography I have three conclusions. One, learning by doing is a consistent methodology of education that mentioned in all writings especially when the purpose of the education is new venture creations. Two, entrepreneurship education is a growing trend all over the world. I can find the writing from many part of the world. Three, we need to create more researches that can produce more solid theories for the popular “learning by doing” methodology in entrepreneurship education.  It is true what was stated in the report on Entrepreneurship Training and Entrepreneurial Learning in Europe (http://www.entredu.com/tiedostot/final_report.pdf): “this brings great challenges to educator in the field of entrepreneurship as only few educators are experienced enough in entrepreneurship and pedagogy at the same time’.


Annotated Bibliography


Rushing.W.F.(1990).Entrepreneurship and Education. Kent (ed). C.A.Entrepreneurship and Education: Current Developments, Future Directions,29-39.

Rushing reflected the entrepreneurship education movement in the US and he stated since 1980 entrepreneurship has emerged as an important element in the dynamics of modern economies. As a result, entrepreneurship education has become an important issue. Rushing pointed out that entrepreneurs have certain “qualities” which should be part of the objectives of the education itself. He believes that some entrepreneurial qualities can be enhanced through formal education by implementing active programs. This article shows that the understanding of the importance of learning by doing for entrepreneurship education had been discussed long time ago. In my opinion learning by doing is not the only method. However the place of methodology is after the objective. The learning by doing method, it is suitable for those who have an objective to be entrepreneurs but for those who just want “to know” entrepreneurship, they can skip the learning by doing and spend more time in collecting the information through a more “traditional method”.      

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The writing was presented in the 10th global Internationalizing Entrepreneurship Education and Training Conference, Tampere, Finland, 10 – 12 July 2000. Jordaan started by a sharing that the South African agricultural sector went through a state of continuous change and it created challenges to the traditional mindset of farmers as an "agricultural producer" to an "agricultural entrepreneur". It is why very important to introduce entrepreneurship in tertiary agricultural education. From his research the author wrote there is no single universal model according to which entrepreneurship should be taught, every context may need different model. However there is a core entrepreneurial capability, they are the capabilities to deal with an increasingly turbulent and global environment. The curriculum becoming more difficult in the case of students enrolling for agricultural education have a diverse background, cultural differences, non supportive attitudes to entrepreneurship and differences in scholastic background of students. The school solved these challenges by integrating entrepreneurship in curricula in different phases. The educational program follow this sequence: the introductory phase to influence the mindset of the student towards the entrepreneurial paradigm, the second phase, the various specialized agricultural disciplines, the third phase focuses on integration of various disciplines and the last phase where business plans are developed. This writing provides a good explanation of entrepreneurship and how entrepreneurship can be blended into a “traditional field” such as agriculture. It is a good example for a developing country that a big numbers of farmers.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sanyang.S.S, Huang.WC.(2005).Entrepreneurship and economic development: the EMPRETEC showcase. Retrieved from http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/webiteteb20043_en.pdf
This writing is presented in the UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENTat   5 January 2005 in Geneva, it also appeared in the International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Volume 6, Number 3. Both writers argued that entrepreneurship is a source of innovation and change, and as such spurs improvements in productivity and economic competitiveness. This paper presented that a comprehensive approach to the promotion of entrepreneurship rests on two primary pillars: strengthening of entrepreneurial skills and improvement of entrepreneurial framework conditions. However both writers stated that from their experiences, the person factors or attitudes and skills is more important than framework conditions. There is not much discussion on entrepreneurship education but this paper mentioned a very important aspect of entrepreneurship education: what is the main theme of the education? Their literature research found out that three of the most frequently mentioned functional roles of entrepreneurs are associated with major schools of thought on entrepreneurship are Risk seeking, Innovativeness and Opportunity seeking. This conception is very important because it shows that entrepreneurship education is not merely on learning the process of business creation, it must include the process of transforming the mindset, attitudes and skill. Students must learn how to deal with risk, how to do innovation and how to have the skill and habit of opportunity seeking. All of these competencies must be learned through a personal and real-life setting.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fayolle.A.(2006).Essay on the Nature of Entrepreneurship Education. Retrieved from http://www.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/RENC2006/Topics06/A/Rencontres_2006_Fayolle.pdf

Alain Fayolle is professor and director of the entrepreneurship research centre at EM Lyon Business School (France) in this essay he try to clarify the question of the definition of entrepreneurship education, the objectives, contents and methods used in entrepreneurship courses and programs. Mr Fayolle stated pedagogy is meant to serve the entrepreneurship teaching objectives and it has a wide range of pedagogical methods, approaches and modalities. He stated that there is no universal pedagogical recipe to teach entrepreneurship however he agreed that “learning by doing” or a real-life situations and learning methods directly in the field for new venture creation training should be preferred. His essay did not discuss some theorist on experiential learning such as David Kolb and J.Mezirow on transformative learning. Since many of his “learning by doing” examples are closely related to experiential learning and transformative learning it will interesting to know the view of Prof Alain Fayolle on these two theorist.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gibb.A. (2007).Enterprise in Education Educating Tommorrows Entrepreneurs. Retrieved from http://www.enorssi.fi/hankkeet/yrittajyyskasvatus/pdf/Gibb.pdf


Professor Allan Gibb is the Professor of Small Business from Durham University (UK). His writing has a focus on a review of the main issues to be considered in the introduction of the 'entrepreneurship' concept into the educational curriculum. He defined Entrepreneurship as a sets of behaviours, attributes and skills that allow individuals and groups to create change and innovation, cope with and even enjoy higher levels of uncertainty and complexity. He argued it is not a’ business-like' in the formal administrative sense therefore entrepreneurial approaches in the classroom will demand high levels of teacher competence. Prof Allan Gibb concluded that the challenge of entrepreneurship education is to allow young people to experience and feel the concept rather than just learn about it in the conventional sense. The leads to emphasis upon a pedagogy that encourages learning: by doing; by exchange; by copying (and learning from the experience); by experimentation; by risk taking and ‘positive’ mistake making; by creative problem solving; by feedback through social interaction; by dramatization and role playing; by close exposure to role models; and, in particular, interaction with the outside/adult world. What the readers may miss from this writing is introduction and explanation of learning theory relates to entrepreneurship education. The information on the pedagogy is more to grouping of activities and do not touch the philosophical foundation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rasheed.H.S. Developing Entrepreneurial Characteristics in Youth: The Effects of Education and Enterprise Experience. Retrieved from http://labsel.pesarosviluppo.it/Modules/ContentManagment/Uploaded/CMItemAttachments/Developing%20entrepreneurial%20characteristics%20in%20youth.pdf


Prof Rasheed from the University of South Florida did a literature research and set a a theoretical framework for entrepreneurship pedagogy and entrepreneurial characteristics. He tested the framework among 502 intermediate level students in an inner city public school. The location of the survey was in  a Newark, NJ Public Schools district. He wanted to answer the question whether entrepreneurship education and experience are effective intervention strategies. The research concludes that training and enterprising behavior can have a significant impact on entrepreneurial characteristics. One important suggestion of Prof Rasheed is the need of the educational system and the business community to develop and nurture entrepreneurship at an early age. What we can learn from this research? Firstly it showed that entrepreneurial characteristics can be encouraged through education and training even there is no guarantee that the education and training can lead all students to new venture creations. Secondly the message to develop entrepreneurship education since early age has many implications. In the case of Indonesia it will demand a major and massive strategic decision and program from the central government. It must backup up by a strong political will.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Frederick.H.H.(2007).Blended Learning in Entrepreneurship Education in the Asia-Pacific:

The paper was submitted to the Small Enterprise Conference at 23-26 September 2007.  Prof Frederick  from Unitec Business School, Auckland, New Zealand try to answer a bold question of “What are the key content areas and pedagogical interventions around which to build a blended learning method for entrepreneurship students (as opposed to other business students)?”. He did a various researches and his conclusion is packaged into the Etappe Method of Training Entrepreneurs, In essence, blended learning is a combination of educational interactions/interventions: (1) live face-to-face (formal) (e.g. instructor-led classroom); (2) live face-to-face (informal) (e.g. work teams; role modeling); (3) virtual collaboration/synchronous (e.g. live e-learning classes); and (4) virtual collaboration/asynchronous (e.g. web learning modules, video and audio CDs/DVDs; knowledge databases). Blended learning focuses on optimizing achievement of learning objectives by applying the “right” learning technologies ; to match the “right” personal learning style; to transfer the “right”skills; to the “right” person; at the “right” time. This is an “ideal concept” of entrepreneurship learning in my opinion but it creates two questions. One can this system be distributed to other countries since the program itself required a high tech provision? Two, is it an efficient program since the concept may demand a differentiation learning program for each student?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Katz. A.J. (2007). Education and Training in Entrepreneurship. Baum.J.R, Frese.M, Baron.R (ed).The Psychology of Entrepreneurship,219-231.

Jerome A.Katz is an educator and psychologist, after he discussed and the importance, the background and the rapid growth of entrepreneurship education, Katz discussed how entrepreneurship education is structured and how entrepreneurship is different. One important question of entrepreneurship education is “Can entrepreneurship be taught” and Katz stated “to be sure, entrepreneurship education can be improved through the inclusion of practicing entrepreneurship in all phases of the educational process”. Katz as a psychologist has showed to the readers the role of psychology in the development of entrepreneurship education what he concluded that “psychological process is central to the process of entrepreneurship” is true. The process of developing entrepreneurial mindset, attitudes and skills will not be effective without a deep understanding of the psychology of the people. Katz has given his specific contribution to entrepreneurship education as a psychologist.    

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carvalho.L.,Costa.T,, Dominguinhos. Pedro.,Pereira.R. (2008).Entrepreneurship, methodologies in higher education an experience in a Portuguese Business School. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12123/1/MPRA_paper_12123.pdf
Entrepreneurship education has become a strategy of the European Union since, EU seeit as a driver for economic growth, competitiveness and job creation and in the long run terms, entrepreneurship may also contribute for economic and social development. The Economics and Management Department Business School (ESCE) Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal has a confidence in the idea and developed a set of pedagogical methodologies: “learning by doing”. The activities include entrepreneurial community’s involvement: bring entrepreneurs to the classroom to talk about their experiences, contact with local entrepreneurs, company visits, involve local business organizations in curricula’s design, offer workshops and seminars, invite business angels and risk capitalists. After researching the research the writers recommend the use of learning by doing method in entrepreneurship education and training, it is better than jus traditional teaching methods. They found that learning from each other, in a flexible way and informal environment, based on problems solving, discussing alternatives and learning from mistakes allows students develop and improve skills; capabilities and attitudes are valuable for their future careers choices to be or not to be business entrepreneurs. This research again offer a proven that “learning by doing” is an important strategy in entrepreneurship education however this field needs more research especially to invent theories on “learning by doing for entrepreneurship education” itself.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------